Read Messages
Stone Mountain mini meet-up
Board: State: Georgia
Nov 16, 2025 3:36am
Hey there our northern neighbors! A few of your southern neighbors are heading up to Stone Mountain Ga for a long weekend of SM boxing in January and we’d love to meet up for supper on Friday. If you are not a FL/GA peep that’s ok, we are a friendly bunch and would love to have you join in the inky fun if you are in town same as us.
So come on out and lets swap some stories and some ink at the Stone Mountain Pizza Cafe.
https://www.atlasquest.com/showinfo.php?eventId=5256
So come on out and lets swap some stories and some ink at the Stone Mountain Pizza Cafe.
https://www.atlasquest.com/showinfo.php?eventId=5256
Re: Potentially (indirectly) got an Antarctica Letterbox?
Board: Letterbox Chatter
Reply to: #1042399 by RIclimber
Nov 16, 2025 5:26am
It sure would be great to be able to visit McMurdo Station, Antarctica if that is where the stamp is from, but I think only researchers are allowed to go there.
When I visited Antarctica in 2019 I intended to place my Penguin Post Office box at the Port Lockroy Base where visitors can mail postcards, but our ship didn't stop there because of bad weather. I ended up making it a digital box and posted clues on LbNA with a link to the stamp image for anyone that did visit Antarctica.
It is possible your postcard came from this place instead of McMurdo Station.
When I visited Antarctica in 2019 I intended to place my Penguin Post Office box at the Port Lockroy Base where visitors can mail postcards, but our ship didn't stop there because of bad weather. I ended up making it a digital box and posted clues on LbNA with a link to the stamp image for anyone that did visit Antarctica.
It is possible your postcard came from this place instead of McMurdo Station.
Re: Potentially (indirectly) got an Antarctica Letterbox?
Board: Letterbox Chatter
Reply to: #1042408 by Silver Eagle
Nov 16, 2025 6:21am
She was at McMurdo for 6 months.
Today is a special day ...
Board: Letterbox Chatter
Nov 16, 2025 7:55am
So Who Is Lying?
Board: It's Politics as Usual
Nov 16, 2025 8:23am
U.S. Department of Justice
Federal Bureau of Investigation
__________________________________________________________________________
As part of our commitment to transparency, the Department of Justice and the Federal
Bureau of Investigation have conducted an exhaustive review of investigative holdings relating to
Jeffrey Epstein. To ensure that the review was thorough, the FBI conducted digital searches of its
databases, hard drives, and network drives as well as physical searches of squad areas, locked
cabinets, desks, closets, and other areas where responsive material may have been stored. These
searches uncovered a significant amount of material, including more than 300 gigabytes of data
and physical evidence.
The files relating to Epstein include a large volume of images of Epstein, images and videos
of victims who are either minors or appear to be minors, and over ten thousand downloaded videos
and images of illegal child sex abuse material and other pornography. Teams of agents, analysts,
attorneys, and privacy and civil liberties experts combed through the digital and documentary
evidence with the aim of providing as much information as possible to the public while
simultaneously protecting victims. Much of the material is subject to court-ordered sealing. Only
a fraction of this material would have been aired publicly had Epstein gone to trial, as the seal
served only to protect victims and did not expose any additional third-parties to allegations of
illegal wrongdoing. Through this review, we found no basis to revisit the disclosure of those
materials and will not permit the release of child pornography.
This systematic review revealed no incriminating “client list.” There was also no credible
evidence found that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals as part of his actions. We did not uncover evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties.
Consistent with prior disclosures, this review confirmed that Epstein harmed over one
thousand victims. Each suffered unique trauma. Sensitive information relating to these victims is
intertwined throughout the materials. This includes specific details such as victim names and
likenesses, physical descriptions, places of birth, associates, and employment history.
One of our highest priorities is combatting child exploitation and bringing justice to
victims. Perpetuating unfounded theories about Epstein serves neither of those ends.
To that end, while we have labored to provide the public with maximum information
regarding Epstein and ensured examination of any evidence in the government’s possession, it is
the determination of the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation that no
further disclosure would be appropriate or warranted.
After a thorough investigation, FBI investigators concluded that Jeffrey Epstein committed
suicide in his cell at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York City on August 10, 2019.
This conclusion is consistent with previous findings, including the August 19, 2019 autopsy
findings of the New York City Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, the November 2019 position
of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York in connection with the
investigation of federal correctional officers responsible for guarding Epstein, and the June 2023
conclusions of DOJ’s Office of the Inspector General.
The conclusion that Epstein died by suicide is further supported by video footage from the
common area of the Special Housing Unit (SHU) where Epstein was housed at the time of his
death. As DOJ’s Inspector General explained in 2023, anyone entering or attempting to enter the
tier where Epstein’s cell was located from the SHU common area would have been captured by
this footage. The FBI’s independent review of this footage confirmed that from the time Epstein
was locked in his cell at around 10:40 pm on August 9, 2019, until around 6:30 am the next
morning, nobody entered any of the tiers in the SHU.
During this review, the FBI enhanced the relevant footage by increasing its contrast,
balancing the color, and improving its sharpness for greater clarity and viewability. The full raw
and enhanced videos are available at the following links: https://www.justice.gov/video-file1;
https://www.justice.gov/video-file2.
Federal Bureau of Investigation
__________________________________________________________________________
As part of our commitment to transparency, the Department of Justice and the Federal
Bureau of Investigation have conducted an exhaustive review of investigative holdings relating to
Jeffrey Epstein. To ensure that the review was thorough, the FBI conducted digital searches of its
databases, hard drives, and network drives as well as physical searches of squad areas, locked
cabinets, desks, closets, and other areas where responsive material may have been stored. These
searches uncovered a significant amount of material, including more than 300 gigabytes of data
and physical evidence.
The files relating to Epstein include a large volume of images of Epstein, images and videos
of victims who are either minors or appear to be minors, and over ten thousand downloaded videos
and images of illegal child sex abuse material and other pornography. Teams of agents, analysts,
attorneys, and privacy and civil liberties experts combed through the digital and documentary
evidence with the aim of providing as much information as possible to the public while
simultaneously protecting victims. Much of the material is subject to court-ordered sealing. Only
a fraction of this material would have been aired publicly had Epstein gone to trial, as the seal
served only to protect victims and did not expose any additional third-parties to allegations of
illegal wrongdoing. Through this review, we found no basis to revisit the disclosure of those
materials and will not permit the release of child pornography.
This systematic review revealed no incriminating “client list.” There was also no credible
evidence found that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals as part of his actions. We did not uncover evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties.
Consistent with prior disclosures, this review confirmed that Epstein harmed over one
thousand victims. Each suffered unique trauma. Sensitive information relating to these victims is
intertwined throughout the materials. This includes specific details such as victim names and
likenesses, physical descriptions, places of birth, associates, and employment history.
One of our highest priorities is combatting child exploitation and bringing justice to
victims. Perpetuating unfounded theories about Epstein serves neither of those ends.
To that end, while we have labored to provide the public with maximum information
regarding Epstein and ensured examination of any evidence in the government’s possession, it is
the determination of the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation that no
further disclosure would be appropriate or warranted.
After a thorough investigation, FBI investigators concluded that Jeffrey Epstein committed
suicide in his cell at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York City on August 10, 2019.
This conclusion is consistent with previous findings, including the August 19, 2019 autopsy
findings of the New York City Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, the November 2019 position
of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York in connection with the
investigation of federal correctional officers responsible for guarding Epstein, and the June 2023
conclusions of DOJ’s Office of the Inspector General.
The conclusion that Epstein died by suicide is further supported by video footage from the
common area of the Special Housing Unit (SHU) where Epstein was housed at the time of his
death. As DOJ’s Inspector General explained in 2023, anyone entering or attempting to enter the
tier where Epstein’s cell was located from the SHU common area would have been captured by
this footage. The FBI’s independent review of this footage confirmed that from the time Epstein
was locked in his cell at around 10:40 pm on August 9, 2019, until around 6:30 am the next
morning, nobody entered any of the tiers in the SHU.
During this review, the FBI enhanced the relevant footage by increasing its contrast,
balancing the color, and improving its sharpness for greater clarity and viewability. The full raw
and enhanced videos are available at the following links: https://www.justice.gov/video-file1;
https://www.justice.gov/video-file2.
So either it is a cover up, or lies, or both. More vindictive prosecutions ordered by a sitting president who features prominently in the same Epstein files? His DOJ, FBI, and he himself made public statements that there is nothing to see in the files and for all of us to move on. Even if the files don't explicitly implicate Trump, why then is he protecting wealthy friends, politicians, donors and industrialists?
If there is nothing to see in the files, why fight the release? Is the considerable political blowback and loss off MAGA supporters less harmful than the contents of the files? Will the full release of the files show the FBI's and DOJ's loyalty to Trump over the Constitution? The slow release of some emails and texts authored by Epstein certainly suggest he was in a position to blackmail his way out of a lengthy sentence. Or at least serve that sentence in a cushier facility a la Maxwell. The full release of the Epstein files was repeatedly promised by Trump during his campaigns.
https://www.justice.gov/opa/media/1407001/dl?inline
We've read of favorable comparisons of Trump and George Washington on the boards. One couldn't tell a lie and one can't tell the truth and many supporters can't tell the difference. Which lies are you willing to swallow or brush off?
Isn't more apparent by the day that it has always been Trump First rather than America First?
Is is really Make American Great Again or Make American Grift Again?
Investigate anyone in those files regardless of who they are.
The conservative activist named by President Donald Trump as the head of the Justice Department’s “Weaponization Working Group” said Tuesday he planned to “name” and “shame” individuals the department determines it is unable to charge with crimes, in what would amount to a major departure from longstanding Justice Department protocols.
Ed Martin described himself at a press conference as the “captain” of the group that is investigating prosecutors who launched past investigations into Trump and his allies.
“There are some really bad actors, some people that did some really bad things to the American people. And if they can be charged, we’ll charge them. But if they can’t be charged, we will name them,” Martin said. “And we will name them, and in a culture that respects shame, they should be people that are ashamed. And that’s a fact. That’s the way things work. And so that’s, that’s how I believe the job operates.”
Ed Martin described himself at a press conference as the “captain” of the group that is investigating prosecutors who launched past investigations into Trump and his allies.
“There are some really bad actors, some people that did some really bad things to the American people. And if they can be charged, we’ll charge them. But if they can’t be charged, we will name them,” Martin said. “And we will name them, and in a culture that respects shame, they should be people that are ashamed. And that’s a fact. That’s the way things work. And so that’s, that’s how I believe the job operates.”
How quaint
Oh, and bless the FBI and DOJ's little hearts for not wanting to release information that the victims themselves demand.
I have an open mind. I am willing to be convinced my lying eyes and ears have it all wrong.
Re: So Who Is Lying?
Board: It's Politics as Usual
Reply to: #1042411 by dingus dufus
Nov 16, 2025 9:51am
Remember, these files were acquired prior to Trump's current administration. Why were they not released then?
I think that they should be released now.
I think that they should be released now.
Re: Whatcha Reading?
Board: Reading Room
Reply to: #1037887 by thepapermagpie
Nov 16, 2025 10:34am
Hear Me
fiction loosely based on the real life of the author
(full disclosure, we are FB friends and chat using American Sign Language)
https://tinyurl.com/4zruptmb
also available on Kindle
fiction loosely based on the real life of the author
(full disclosure, we are FB friends and chat using American Sign Language)
https://tinyurl.com/4zruptmb
also available on Kindle
Re: So Who Is Lying?
Board: It's Politics as Usual
Reply to: #1042412 by Oberon_Kenobi
Nov 16, 2025 10:41am
Remember, these files were acquired prior to Trump's current administration. Why were they not released then?
the reason the files were not released before is a legal one. you can not release files during an ongoing investigation. the investigation was closed in august of 2019 due to epstein's death.
perhaps the better question should be ...... who was the president in 2019 and why did that president have the doj put a stop to the investigation?
smile
Re: So Who Is Lying?
Board: It's Politics as Usual
Reply to: #1042412 by Oberon_Kenobi
Nov 16, 2025 12:02pm
Why were they not released then?
Perhaps it wasn't a campaign promise by Biden to release them.
The democrats were more interested in the unusually lenient sweetheart deal Epstein was able to get a “deal of a lifetime.” from the then US attorney assigned to the case and future Trump Admin Labor Secretary Alex Acosta (hmmm?)
The documents appear to have been tied up during court cases and subsequent appeal processes.
Ultimately they need to be released.
Also the shameful slap on Epstein's wrist and how and why it happened.
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article220097825.html
Does he get the deal as a reward for not rolling over on connected people (of all stripes?) If more released emails continue to show Epstein's alluding to having material to hold over Trump's head, will that drive the conspiracy theorists to question more about his suicide? Some coincidences may start to look less coincidental to them.
Re: Today is a special day ...
Board: Letterbox Chatter
Reply to: #1042410 by speedsquare
Nov 16, 2025 12:53pm
All hail the great and powerful Waz !
Happy cake day. 🎊 🎈 🎉
Happy cake day. 🎊 🎈 🎉
Re: So Who Is Lying?
Board: It's Politics as Usual
Reply to: #1042415 by dingus dufus
Nov 16, 2025 3:25pm
Ultimately they need to be released.
So, we agree again.
Write down another rare occurrence!
I disagree with a lot of cases where prosecutors have let off people with light sentences. This is another of them.
Re: So Who Is Lying?
Board: It's Politics as Usual
Reply to: #1042414 by uneksia
Nov 16, 2025 3:30pm
the reason the files were not released before is a legal one. you can not release files during an ongoing investigation. the investigation was closed in august of 2019 due to epstein's death.
So, investigation closed in 2019, allowing the information to be released. It is unfortunate that there wasn't another administration that could have released it between then and now.
Re: So Who Is Lying?
Board: It's Politics as Usual
Reply to: #1042418 by Oberon_Kenobi
Nov 16, 2025 4:20pm
So, investigation closed in 2019
Weren't they held back from the public for years while various appeals processes played out?
Re: Today is a special day ...
Board: Letterbox Chatter
Reply to: #1042410 by speedsquare
Nov 16, 2025 4:45pm
Happy today (and tomorrow)!
Re: So Who Is Lying?
Board: It's Politics as Usual
Reply to: #1042419 by dingus dufus
Nov 16, 2025 5:36pm
Just the portions relevant to dingus dufus' comment:
uneksia wrote:
I wrote:
dingus dufus wrote:
Are you calling uneksia's comment incomplete?
However, dingus, we still agree that the complete files need to be released.
uneksia wrote:
the reason the files were not released before is a legal one. you can not release files during an ongoing investigation. the investigation was closed in august of 2019 due to epstein's death.
I wrote:
So, investigation closed in 2019, allowing the information to be released.
dingus dufus wrote:
Weren't they held back from the public for years while various appeals processes played out?
Are you calling uneksia's comment incomplete?
However, dingus, we still agree that the complete files need to be released.
Re: Today is a special day ...
Board: Letterbox Chatter
Reply to: #1042410 by speedsquare
Nov 16, 2025 6:11pm
Happy Birthday, Wassa! Hope it was a great day/weekend.
Re: So Who Is Lying?
Board: It's Politics as Usual
Reply to: #1042421 by Oberon_Kenobi
Nov 16, 2025 7:23pm
Are you calling uneksia's comment incomplete?
It's factually 100% accurate.
Re: So Who Is Lying?
Board: It's Politics as Usual
Reply to: #1042423 by dingus dufus
Nov 16, 2025 8:25pm
I wrote:
dingus dufus wrote:
That is an answer that does NOT answer the question that I asked.
For instance, if his statement is complete then the Biden administration could have released the files.
If his statement was incomplete then it would prompt someone who was interested in a correct statement to make such a correction.
Are you calling uneksia's comment incomplete?
dingus dufus wrote:
It's factually 100% accurate.
That is an answer that does NOT answer the question that I asked.
For instance, if his statement is complete then the Biden administration could have released the files.
If his statement was incomplete then it would prompt someone who was interested in a correct statement to make such a correction.
Re: Behind The Scenes Stuff
Board: Movie Moments
Reply to: #1042406 by MissMoon
Nov 16, 2025 9:19pm
I had seen that recently. I’m a huge film buff and I love that kind of stuff. That clip is especially satisfying because the Coens aren’t known for talking about their work.
I love their films. I think my favorite is Miller’s Crossing.
I really miss directors commentary tracks. To hear a great one, listen to Micheal Mann over Collateral. That is if you can find the DVD and you have a player…
I love their films. I think my favorite is Miller’s Crossing.
I really miss directors commentary tracks. To hear a great one, listen to Micheal Mann over Collateral. That is if you can find the DVD and you have a player…
Re: So Who Is Lying?
Board: It's Politics as Usual
Reply to: #1042424 by Oberon_Kenobi
Nov 16, 2025 10:16pm
Her statement is a complete statement.
Re: Same sex marriages illegal?!?!
Board: It's Politics as Usual
Reply to: #1042390 by narocks
Nov 16, 2025 10:35pm
Someone hasn't been paying attention:
Key ways the Trumps have reportedly benefited include:
Payments at Trump Properties: Special interest groups, lobbyists, and even government entities like the Secret Service have spent money at Trump-owned hotels, social clubs, and golf courses. Foreign governments also made payments to Trump businesses, which critics argue potentially violated the U.S. Constitution's emoluments clause.
Business Deals and Expansions: The Trump Organization has pursued new real estate deals and expansions in countries like Vietnam and Saudi Arabia during and after his presidency, raising questions about whether these deals were intended to curry favor with the president.
Cryptocurrency Ventures: Donald Trump Jr., Eric Trump, and others in the Trump orbit have launched cryptocurrency projects, including a "meme coin". Reports indicate the family and partners have made a significant amount in trading fees, and Trump has reportedly met with crypto investors and promised to promote the industry from the White House.
Trump Media & Technology Group (TMTG): The company which runs the social media app Truth Social, has provided a potential avenue for profit, with its stock performance tied to the president's ongoing public profile and base.
Policy Alignment with Financial Interests: Certain administration policies, such as specific environmental and business regulation rollbacks, reportedly aligned with the financial interests of the Trump Organization and its related industries (e.g., the construction industry and golf courses). The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 provided substantial tax breaks to corporations and wealthy individuals, which benefited Trump and others in his economic circle.
High-Value Deals for Family Members: Jeff Bezos reportedly paid a high licensing fee for a documentary about Melania Trump after a dinner at Mar-a-Lago, a transaction described as unusual for a documentary licensing deal.
Key ways the Trumps have reportedly benefited include:
Payments at Trump Properties: Special interest groups, lobbyists, and even government entities like the Secret Service have spent money at Trump-owned hotels, social clubs, and golf courses. Foreign governments also made payments to Trump businesses, which critics argue potentially violated the U.S. Constitution's emoluments clause.
Business Deals and Expansions: The Trump Organization has pursued new real estate deals and expansions in countries like Vietnam and Saudi Arabia during and after his presidency, raising questions about whether these deals were intended to curry favor with the president.
Cryptocurrency Ventures: Donald Trump Jr., Eric Trump, and others in the Trump orbit have launched cryptocurrency projects, including a "meme coin". Reports indicate the family and partners have made a significant amount in trading fees, and Trump has reportedly met with crypto investors and promised to promote the industry from the White House.
Trump Media & Technology Group (TMTG): The company which runs the social media app Truth Social, has provided a potential avenue for profit, with its stock performance tied to the president's ongoing public profile and base.
Policy Alignment with Financial Interests: Certain administration policies, such as specific environmental and business regulation rollbacks, reportedly aligned with the financial interests of the Trump Organization and its related industries (e.g., the construction industry and golf courses). The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 provided substantial tax breaks to corporations and wealthy individuals, which benefited Trump and others in his economic circle.
High-Value Deals for Family Members: Jeff Bezos reportedly paid a high licensing fee for a documentary about Melania Trump after a dinner at Mar-a-Lago, a transaction described as unusual for a documentary licensing deal.
Re: Same sex marriages illegal?!?!
Board: It's Politics as Usual
Reply to: #1042390 by narocks
Nov 16, 2025 10:37pm
Also, the failings of others doesn't make him great, which was your patently, demonstrably untrue claim.
You are equating garden-variety back-scratching to the complete demise of a functioning government and the rise of fascism in our country. This is unprecedented. A consensual sex act in the White House is not the equivalent of rape, sexual assault, & sexual abuse of a minor.
I find it interesting that if the answers aren't couched in specific ways that Trump personally has impinged on gay marriage, everything else can be ignored, as if empowering the kind of bigotry we see, the intentional attack on DEI, bullying institutions of higher learning into embracing Trump-speak (though he is unqualified to weigh in on matters of science, history, his job, military strategy, meteorology, prevention of disease . . .) the unearned hero-ification of Charlie Kirk, his cosying up to known white supremacists and his personal behavior regarding people of color weren't enough. The man cheats at golf. Five times bankrupt. . . on and on. He has quite literally failed at everything he's tried.
You've painted yourself into a corner and have just planted yourself there because every other surface is wet.
So, I'll bring it up again. What would it take? If attempting to overthrow the government didn't get your attention, you're beyond reason.
You are equating garden-variety back-scratching to the complete demise of a functioning government and the rise of fascism in our country. This is unprecedented. A consensual sex act in the White House is not the equivalent of rape, sexual assault, & sexual abuse of a minor.
I find it interesting that if the answers aren't couched in specific ways that Trump personally has impinged on gay marriage, everything else can be ignored, as if empowering the kind of bigotry we see, the intentional attack on DEI, bullying institutions of higher learning into embracing Trump-speak (though he is unqualified to weigh in on matters of science, history, his job, military strategy, meteorology, prevention of disease . . .) the unearned hero-ification of Charlie Kirk, his cosying up to known white supremacists and his personal behavior regarding people of color weren't enough. The man cheats at golf. Five times bankrupt. . . on and on. He has quite literally failed at everything he's tried.
You've painted yourself into a corner and have just planted yourself there because every other surface is wet.
So, I'll bring it up again. What would it take? If attempting to overthrow the government didn't get your attention, you're beyond reason.
Re: So Who Is Lying?
Board: It's Politics as Usual
Reply to: #1042411 by dingus dufus
Nov 16, 2025 10:42pm
He's just reversed himself on releasing the files. I bet he thinks his followers will swallow anything, and they've found their dog whistles to spin it for them. It will be very interesting. The emails alone are interesting. I mean, how much of a pond scum do you have to be for Jerry frikkin Epstein to despise you?
Re: So Who Is Lying?
Board: It's Politics as Usual
Reply to: #1042412 by Oberon_Kenobi
Nov 16, 2025 10:43pm
Oh, I'm not naive enough to think they won't fry a boatload of Dems also. Powerful men have never been held accountable in this country. We have TWO sitting supreme court justices who have been accused of sexual crimes for starters. . . I bet Trump thinks he'll weather this, just like he has all the other times.
Re: Today is a special day ...
Board: Letterbox Chatter
Reply to: #1042422 by Nature Hikers
Nov 16, 2025 10:57pm
Thank you, everyone, for the birthday wishes!! It truly means a lot to me.
Re: Behind The Scenes Stuff
Board: Movie Moments
Reply to: #1042425 by DarkZen and Evil Cow Pie
Nov 17, 2025 6:27am
Do you watch the Hollywood round table on The Hollywood Reporter channel? That’s great.
For some reason I have gotten out of the habit of looking at it. I need to get back to it. Actors, directors, producers.
For some reason I have gotten out of the habit of looking at it. I need to get back to it. Actors, directors, producers.
Re: Same sex marriages illegal?!?!
Board: It's Politics as Usual
Reply to: #1042393 by narocks
Nov 17, 2025 6:45am
He has revoked people with a mental illness, that think they are something other then what they are, from serving in the military, and for tax payers dollars being used to pay for operations to help in these peoples delusions.
Like HER??
Re: Today is a special day ...
Board: Letterbox Chatter
Reply to: #1042431 by wassamatta u
Nov 17, 2025 10:12am
Happy belated birthday 🎂
Condo
Condo
Re: So Who Is Lying?
Board: It's Politics as Usual
Reply to: #1042424 by Oberon_Kenobi
Nov 17, 2025 11:22am
It was actually Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal that held up the files during Biden's term. And even once her appeal was finally rejected, Sept or Oct of 2024, the files would have had to be sorted for victims' names to be redacted.
Even if Biden had ordered the DOJ to release the files then, the MAGA crowd would have complained it was a hoax to try to sway the election.
Even if Biden had ordered the DOJ to release the files then, the MAGA crowd would have complained it was a hoax to try to sway the election.
Re: Same sex marriages illegal?!?!
Board: It's Politics as Usual
Reply to: #1042433 by Wry Me
Nov 17, 2025 11:23am
Also, the failings of others doesn't make him great, which was your patently, demonstrably untrue claim.
That’s something I get really tired of also. Bush did so and so, Obama did so and so. So Trump…..yadda, yadda.
That is so irrelevant.
